Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorValdesalici A
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-20T11:42:03Z
dc.date.available2018-11-20T11:42:03Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.isbn978-88-495-3692-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10863/7345
dc.description.abstractThe study investigates the principle of financial responsibility from a comparative and legal perspective. From a political point of view, financial responsibility is a fundamental component of any decentralizing process. From an economic perspective, it is a precondition for efficiency. Therefore, financial responsibility becomes the cornerstone of compound States. At the same time, the “welfare state” model calls for a system in which autonomy and solidarity coexist. Against this background, second-generation theories of fiscal federalism underpin the concept of “fiscal responsibility at the margin” and advocate for, at least, partial responsibility of subnational entities on the revenue side. The idea builds on the argument that entities entrusted with own financing powers tend to be politically more responsible to their citizens. This is due to the assumption that financial responsibility through democratic control serves as a tool to strengthen political autonomy itself. The theoretical construct is well reflected in the selected case-studies, as it has been the trajectory for the Spanish reform in 2009, as well as for the reform under discussion in Germany. Moving from the theoretical paradigm of “fiscal responsibility at the margin” to legal practice, the need to observe how and to what extent revenue is distributed among and within the different layers of governments emerges. The way in which the vertical fiscal gap is addressed influences the degree of financial autonomy of subnational entities. The major issue at stake is the revenue structure of the intermediate tier of government, paying particular attention to the legal tools and procedures devoted to revenue-sharing, as all these elements play a great role in defining the extent of financial autonomy on the revenue side. After some preliminary remarks on the background theories governing the scenario (part one, chapter 1) and on the essential features of the selected case-studies (part one, chapter 2), the study focuses on the principle of financial responsibility as embedded in the legal frameworks and developed through constitutional jurisprudence (part one, chapters 3 and 4). It scrutinizes, classifies and compares the legal tools, which put the principle into practice (part three, chapters 5, 6 and 7). The ultimate aim is to provide a comparative measurement (part four, chapter 9) and a comparative assessment (part four, chapter 10) of these instruments, in order to estimate the existing margin of responsibility vested in the intermediate level of government, that is, the autonomous Communities and the Länder. In doing so, the system of intergovernmental financial relations will be taken into consideration paying attention to both the “law in books” and the “law in action”. This approach is pivotal for understanding the way in which these systems function.en_US
dc.language.isoiten_US
dc.publisherEdizioni Scientifiche Italianeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCollana del Dipartimanto di Scienze Giuridiche dell'Università di Verona;
dc.rights
dc.subjectFiscal resonsabilityen_US
dc.subjectFiscal autonomyen_US
dc.subjectGerman Länderen_US
dc.subjectSpanish Autonomous Communitiesen_US
dc.subjectLegal comparative analysisen_US
dc.subjectLaw in booksen_US
dc.subjectLaw in actionen_US
dc.titleFederalismo fiscale e responsabilizzazione politico-finanziaria: comparazione giuridica ed esercizi di misurazione del dirittoen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
dc.date.updated2018-11-20T11:28:49Z
dc.language.isiIT-IT
dc.description.fulltextnoneen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record