Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCastelli M
dc.contributor.authorAnderson M
dc.contributor.authorYang Y
dc.contributor.authorWohlfahrt G
dc.contributor.authorBertoldi G
dc.contributor.authorNiedrist G
dc.contributor.authorHammerle A
dc.contributor.authorZhao P
dc.contributor.authorZebisch M
dc.contributor.authorNotarnicola C
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-25T11:21:31Z
dc.date.available2018-09-25T11:21:31Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0034-4257
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.062
dc.identifier.urihhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425718300749
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10863/6100
dc.description.abstractThis work aims to assess a diagnostic approach which links evapotranspiration (ET) to land surface temperature (LST) measured by thermal remote sensing in the Alps. We estimated gridded ET, from field (30 m) to regional (1 km) scales, and we performed a specific study on grassland ecosystems in the Alps in South Tyrol (Italy), to evaluate the model sensitivity to different types of land management. The energy balance model TSEB ALEXI (Two Source Energy Balance Atmosphere Land EXchange Inverse) was first applied to Meteosat satellite data. Then ET was estimated by the flux disaggregation procedure DisALEXI, driven by MODIS and Landsat LST retrievals, which has never been applied before in a mountain region. We evaluated the model against eddy-covariance (EC) measurements from established stations in the Alps, and analyzed the main limitations which affect the model performance in mountainous regions. The TSEB model, applied in plot-scale mode using tower-based meteorological and LST input data, performed well with errors in daytime (6–18 UTC+1) latent heat flux around 30–60 W m−2 in comparison with flux measurements corrected for the lack of closure in the energy balance. For landscape ET retrievals, while Landsat resolution (30 m) is preferable for capturing small-scale heterogeneity in landscape moisture conditions, and for direct comparison with tower fluxes, persistent cloud cover resulted in no clear Landsat scenes during the study period. MODIS-based retrievals at 1 km resolution are too coarse to resolve the flux tower footprint in this complex landscape, yielding discrepancies of 100 W m−2 in model-measurement comparisons. Still, MODIS DisALEXI partitioning of the energy budget was reasonable and enabled to detect evaporative stress at regional scale expressed as the ratio between actual and potential ET, fPET. We evaluated fPET in comparison with a crop stress index based on cumulative air temperature and precipitation at different stations in the study area, and investigated ability to capture differential responses between managed and unmanaged grasslands. Results show that in the Alps i) moderate resolution thermal data can be used to monitor evaporative stress at the regional scale; ii) the spatial-temporal evolution of ET can be characterized from MODIS and Landsat thermal data with limitations which are due to the low availability of clear-sky scenes and to the small-scale (∼10 m) changes in soil moisture, topography and canopy density, which control ET patterns in mountainous regions; iii) solar radiation and leaf area index are critical variables which strongly affect the accuracy of the modeled energy fluxes.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights
dc.titleTwo-source energy balance modeling of evapotranspiration in Alpine grasslandsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.updated2018-09-25T11:19:34Z
dc.language.isiEN-GB
dc.journal.titleRemote Sensing of Environment
dc.description.fulltextembargoeden_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record