On the elusive notion of meta-agreement
MetadataShow full item record
Public deliberation has been defended as a rational and noncoercive way to overcome paradoxical results from democratic voting, by promoting consensus on the available alternatives on the political agenda. Some critics have argued that full consensus is too demanding and inimical to pluralism and have pointed out that single-peakedness, a much less stringent condition, is sufficient to overcome voting paradoxes. According to these accounts, deliberation can induce single-peakedness through the creation of a 'meta-agreement', that is, agreement on the dimension according to which the issues at stake are 'conceptualized'. We argue here that once all the conditions needed for deliberation to bring about single-peakedness through meta-agreement are unpacked and made explicit, meta-agreement turns out to be a highly demanding condition, and one that is very inhospitable to pluralism.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Dal Negro, S (Benjamins, 2013)The study of dialects and of closely-related systems can be very interesting under the perspective of language typology since they give insights into different forms of linguistic patterning, setting off from very similar ...
An Analysis of Agreement in Classical Music Perception and its Relationship to Listener Characteristics Schedl M; Eghbal-Zadeh H; Gómez E; Tkalcic M (ISMIR, 2016)We present a study, carried out on 241 participants, which investigates on classical music material the agreement of listeners on perceptual music aspects (related to emotion, tempo, complexity, and instrumentation) and ...