Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKacimi M
dc.contributor.authorGamper J
dc.contributor.editorBerendt B
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-01T10:50:12Z
dc.date.available2018-08-01T10:50:12Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4503-0717-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2063576.2063594
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2063594
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10863/5428
dc.description.abstractDiversifying search results of queries seeking for different view points about controversial topics is key to improving satisfaction of users. The challenge for finding different opinions is how to maximize the number of discussed arguments without being biased against specific sentiments. This paper addresses the issue by first introducing a new model that represents the patterns occurring in documents about controversial topics. Second, proposing an opinion diversification model that uses (1) relevance of documents, (2) semantic diversification to capture different arguments and (3) sentiment diversification to identify positive, negative and neutral sentiments about the query topic. We have conducted our experiments using queries on various controversial topics and applied our diversification model on the set of documents returned by Google search engine. The results show that our model outperforms the native ranking of Web pages about controversial topics by a significant margin. © 2011 ACM.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherACMen_US
dc.rights
dc.titleDiversifying search results of controversial queriesen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.date.updated2018-05-16T07:39:54Z
dc.publication.titleProceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
dc.language.isiEN-GB
dc.description.fulltextreserveden_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record