Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJanssen U
dc.contributor.authorWiese R
dc.contributor.authorSchlesewsky M
dc.contributor.editor
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-12T09:57:09Z
dc.date.available2017-10-12T09:57:09Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.issn0911-6044
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.04.002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10863/3240
dc.description.abstractIn the present study, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the neurophysiological correlates of violations of word formation rules in German derivational morphology. To this end, we compared violations of the German noun forming morphemes -ung (violation of morphosyntactic category) and -heit/-keit (violation of prosodic constraints). Our main objective was to ascertain whether morphosyntactic category violations would differ from violations of prosodic constraints. For each type of incorrect suffixation, the data yielded an N400-like effect, but the processing of incorrectly derived words varies according to the type of violation: Effects for -ung- and -heit violations appeared approximately 200 ms earlier than for -keit-violations. Furthermore, the negativity effect for -ung was stronger and distributed over the whole scalp, whereas the effect for -heit and -keit is restricted to parietal electrodes. We interpret the differences as suggesting that different word formation restrictions play different roles in the processing of derived words, such that morphosyntactic restrictions are more salient than prosodic ones.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleElectrophysiological responses to violations of morphosyntactic and prosodic features in derived German nounsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.updated2016-12-19T13:57:33Z
dc.publication.title
dc.journal.titleJournal of Neurolinguistics
dc.description.fulltextnoneen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record