Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchorlemmer M
dc.contributor.authorConfalonieri R
dc.contributor.authorPlaza E
dc.contributor.editorBesold TR
dc.contributor.editorKutz O
dc.contributor.editorLeon C
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-09T15:44:24Z
dc.date.available2017-03-09T15:44:24Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1613-0073
dc.identifier.urihttp://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1767/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10863/1759
dc.description.abstractWe address the problem on how newly invented concepts are evaluated with respect to a background ontology of conceptual knowledge so as to decide which of them are to be accepted into a system of familiar concepts, and how this, in turn, may affect the previously accepted conceptualisation. As technique to tackle this problem we explore the applicability of Paul Thagard's computational theory of coherence. In particular, we propose a formalisation of Thagard's notion of conceptual coherence for concepts represented in the AL description logic and explore by means of an illustrative example the role coherence may play in the process of conceptual blending.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCEURen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCEUR Workshop Proceedings;
dc.rights
dc.subjectCoherenceen_US
dc.subjectConceptual blendingen_US
dc.subjectDescription logicsen_US
dc.titleCoherent concept inventionen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.date.updated2017-03-09T11:54:43Z
dc.publication.titleProceedings of the Workshop on Computational Creativity, Concept Invention, and General Intelligence (C3GI 2016), co-located with the 28th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information (ESSLLI 2016); Bozen-Bolzano, Italy, August 20-22, 2016
dc.language.isiEN-GB
dc.description.fulltextnoneen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record