Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoreiko D
dc.contributor.authorVidusso G
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-29T09:15:10Z
dc.date.available2019-11-29T09:15:10Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1520-3255
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jai.2019.21.4.067
dc.identifier.urihttps://jai.pm-research.com/content/21/4/67
dc.identifier.urihttps://bia.unibz.it/handle/10863/11604
dc.description.abstractThe Fintech revolution, crowdfunding and blockchain-based funding have dramatically reduced borrowing and lending transaction costs. Many have argued that ultimately this should lead to the complete disintermediation of financing for start-ups and SMEs. However, persistent asymmetric information and moral hazard problems have led to the creation of a new class of intermediaries that play a vital role in these new innovative financing methods. We review the new ecosystem built around Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), and in particular study the role of the ICO aggregators, listing and rating portals. Using our hand-constructed database of all ICOs from inception in 2013 to September 2017, we find robust statistical confirmation that extensive coverage of a particular fundraising campaign in the ICO aggregators’ lists is associated with more successful token sales. However, ratings data seems to vary considerably across different ratings websites and appears to be of mediocre quality. Investors should therefore treat such ratings with caution.en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation
dc.rights
dc.titleNew blockchain intermediaries: do ICO rating websites do their job well?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.updated2019-11-29T03:02:14Z
dc.language.isiEN-GB
dc.journal.titleThe Journal of Alternative Investments
dc.description.fulltextreserveden_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record