Ontology merging as social choice: Judgment aggregation under the open world assumption
MetadataShow full item record
The problem of merging several ontologies has important applications in the Semantic Web, medical ontology engineering and other domains where information from several distinct sources needs to be integrated in a coherent manner. We propose to view ontology merging as a problem of social choice, i. e. as a problem of aggregating the input of a set of individuals into an adequate collective decision. That is, we propose to view ontology merging as ontology aggregation. As a first step in this direction, we formulate several desirable properties for ontology aggregators, we identify the incompatibility of some of these properties, and we define and analyse several simple aggregation procedures. Our approach is closely related to work in judgment aggregation, but with the crucial difference that we adopt an open world assumption, by distinguishing between facts not included in an agent's ontology and facts explicitly negated in an agent's ontology.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Porello D; Troquard N; Confalonieri R; Galliani P; Kutz O; Peñaloza R (Springer, 2017)Ontologies represent principled, formalised descriptions of agents’ conceptualisations of a domain. For a community of agents, these descriptions may significantly differ. We propose an aggregative view of the integration ...
Porello D; Troquard N; Peñaloza R; Confalonieri R; Galliani P; Kutz O (IJCAI, 2018)Axiom weakening is a novel technique that allows for fine-grained repair of inconsistent ontologies. In a multi-agent setting, integrating ontologies corresponding to multiple agents may lead to inconsistencies. Such ...
Calvanese D; Kharlamvov E; Nutt W; Thorne C (ACM, 2008)Answering queries over ontologies is an important issue for the Semantic Web. Aggregate queries were widely studied for relational databases but almost no results are known for aggregate queries over ontologies. In this ...