Abstract
This article critically examines the use of Easy Language in the context of linguistic diversity, moving beyond its original accessibility focus for persons with cognitive or intellectual disabilities. Specifically, the application of Easy Language to non-majority language speakers (such as migrants and linguistic minorities) raises theoretical and practical questions. The analysis draws on three theoretical frameworks (vulnerability, capability/inclusion, and linguistic justice) to assess potential and limitations of Easy Language. The article argues that Easy Language can reduce certain linguistic barriers, particularly the general language barrier. However, its one-directional nature limits reciprocity, autonomy, and integration potential. Furthermore, framing non-native speakers as ‘vulnerable’ risks paternalism and othering, while reliance on Easy Language alone may substitute for more robust linguistic rights or structural measures that recognise minority languages. The article concludes that Easy Language should form part of a diversified language policy mix, not a stand-alone solution. Future research should include co-development with target users, empirical testing in intercultural settings, and exploration of AI-driven simplification and translation technologies.