Abstract
Reproducibility is a main principle in science and fundamental to ensure scientific progress. However, many recent works point out that there are widespread deficiencies for this aspect in the AI field, making the reproducibility of results impractical or even impossible. We therefore studied the state of reproducibility support on the topic of Reinforcement Learning & Recommender Systems to analyse the situation in this context. We collected a total of 60 papers and analysed them by defining a set of variables to inspect the most important aspects that enable reproducibility, such as dataset, pre-processing code, hardware specifications, software dependencies, algorithm implementation, algorithm hyperparameters, and experiment code. Furthermore, we used the ACM Badges definitions assigning them to the selected papers. We discovered that, like in many other AI domains, the Reinforcement Learning & Recommender Systems field is grappling with a reproducibility crisis, as none of the selected papers were reproducible when strictly applying the ACM Badges definitions according to our analysis.