Logo image
Misconceptions in Finite-Trace and Infinite-Trace Linear Temporal Logic
Conference proceeding   Open access   Peer reviewed

Misconceptions in Finite-Trace and Infinite-Trace Linear Temporal Logic

B Greenman, S Prasad, A Di Stasio, S Zhu, G De Giacomo, S Krishnamurthi, Marco Montali, T Nelson and M Zizyte
Formal Methods. 26th International Symposium, FM 2024, Milan, Italy, September 9–13, 2024, Proceedings, Part I, Vol.14933, pp.579-599
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 14933
26th International Symposium on Formal Methods, FM 2024 (Milan, 09/09/2024–13/09/2024)
2025
Handle:
https://hdl.handle.net/10863/53096

Abstract

User studies Misconceptions LTL LTLf
With the growing use of temporal logics in areas ranging from robot planning to runtime verification, it is critical that users have a clear understanding of what a specification means. Toward this end, we have been developing a catalog of semantic errors and a suite of test instruments targeting various user-groups. The catalog is of interest to educators, to logic designers, to formula authors, and to tool builders, e.g., to identify mistakes. The test instruments are suitable for classroom teaching or self-study. This paper reports on five sets of survey data collected over a three-year span. We study misconceptions about finite-trace LTLf in three ltl-aware audiences, and misconceptions about standard ltl in novices. We find several mistakes, even among experts. In addition, the data supports several categories of errors in both LTLf and ltl that have not been identified in prior work. These findings, based on data from actual users, offer insights into what specific ways temporal logics are tricky and provide a groundwork for future interventions.
pdf
978-3-031-71162-6_30710.69 kBDownloadView
Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71162-6_30View

Details

Metrics

1 Record Views
Logo image