Abstract
Traditional climate research often neglects accounting for how social factors like gender, ethnicity, race, age, disability, and socioeconomic status interact and create unique vulnerabilities. An intersectional approach examines these social factors, identifying how they contribute to complex inequalities and vulnerabilities. In this context, this paper presents research from the ASCEND project, which examines climate justice through intersectional perspectives, combining concepts of vulnerability, resilience, socio-ecological transformation and others through an interdisciplinary qualitative literature review and an intersectional analysis of n=35 case studies.
Our paper suggests that intersectionality serves as both a theoretical lens and a practical method for addressing intersecting vulnerabilities. Our of 35 case studies, 16 case studies are grounded in theory, 19 combine theoretical and practical elements. Despite the growing importance of intersectionality in environmental policies, limited evidence exists of its explicit inclusion in adaptation plans. Institutional and political structures often lack the capacity, resources, and commitment for effective intersectional analysis. The analysed case studies suggest a slow advancement toward a dynamic and contextual interplay approach to intersectionality.
Finally, our paper calls for practical tools like frameworks, guidelines, and metrics to implement intersectional approaches in climate adaptation. It stresses the importance of resources, institutional support, and community involvement. Also, enhancing neighbourhood or other informal networks and learning from marginalized groups are essential for effective and inclusive climate change adaptation strategies.