Abstract
Complement genes encompass a wide array of variants, giving rise to numerous protein isoforms that have often been shown to exhibit clinical significance. Given that these variants have been discovered over a span of 50 y, one challenging consequence is the inconsistency in the terminology used to classify them. This issue is prominently evident in the nomenclature used for complement C6 and C7 variants, for which we observed a great discrepancy between previously published works and variants described in current genome browsers. This report discusses the causes for the discrepancies in C6 and C7 nomenclature and seeks to establish a classification system that would unify existing and future variants. The inconsistency in the methods used to annotate amino acids and the modifications pinpointed in the C6 and C7 primers are some of the factors that contribute greatly to the discrepancy in the nomenclature. Several variants that were classified incorrectly are highlighted in this report, and we showcase first-hand how a unified classification system is important to match previous with current genetic information. Ultimately, we hope that the proposed classification system of nomenclature becomes an incentive for studies on complement variants and their physiological and/or pathological effects.