Abstract
In the last decades, the effects of nitrogen (N) deposition on temperate forests have received much interest. Studies recorded several changes in soil carbon (C) and N cycles due to extra reactive N available. For instance, past studies reported that N deposition, may influence CO2 emission, lower CH4 consumption by the soil and increase the emission of N2O. Nevertheless, the mechanistic understanding of these ecological responses is still far to be reached. However, most of the studies neglected to include the canopy interception in the experiments simulating N addition, notwithstanding tree canopy have shown to change both the amount and the chemical composition of the N deposition. Hence, experiments simulating this process by applying fertilization above the canopy are needed.
The aim of this study is to explore how N deposition influences greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in a temperate oak forest (Quercus petraea Liebl.) located in Monticolo (Bolzano, Italy). In this site, a set of three plots was created and replicated three times. Each set includes a control plot, a plot with below-canopy fertilization (NBL) and a plot with above-canopy fertilization (NAB). The fertilization is applied, since 2015, from May to September, for a total annual N addition of 20 kg N ha-1.
Since April 2018, CO2 emission has been monthly measured with a portable infrared gas analyzer. Measurements were performed on three points per plot, for a total of 27 measurement points. During measurements, soil moisture and soil temperature at 10 cm depth were measured as well.
The measurements of CH4 and N2O started during the growing season in 2019 and are performed on a monthly basis by a static chamber method. Three chambers were installed per plots, for a total of 27 chambers.
We will present the preliminary results of this study. The results showed that the 5-year N fertilization did not lead to significant differences between plots in terms of GHG fluxes. The sensitivity of CO2 emission to temperature was not influenced by extra N. The differences were not significant between fertilized and unfertilized plots, nor between the two fertilization methods.